10-25-2020, 11:35 AM
We're trying our best not to ban on annoyance alone. Ever since some specific drama occurred a few weeks ago, I've been trying to mitigate any chat tension that occurs (whether there's some politics being brought up, or if idle posting is disturbing the flow of the chat).
Even if a person is not specifically breaking any rules, it should actually be viewed more of a cause-and-effect type of deal. One person can actually be the cause for multiple people causing tension to occur on the chat. It's happened back in 2017 with a very controversial person, and that banning him helped a lot with cleaning discrepancies among the community.
I hope that this provides a bit of insight on why anyone should be banned on this site. There are times where the moderators screw up in decision-making, but we'll have to see what happens from here.
Even if a person is not specifically breaking any rules, it should actually be viewed more of a cause-and-effect type of deal. One person can actually be the cause for multiple people causing tension to occur on the chat. It's happened back in 2017 with a very controversial person, and that banning him helped a lot with cleaning discrepancies among the community.
I hope that this provides a bit of insight on why anyone should be banned on this site. There are times where the moderators screw up in decision-making, but we'll have to see what happens from here.
-
x1
-
-
x1
- Syntax
-