05-27-2022, 02:54 AM
like i said in site chat:
i also voted no. altho it's a nice idea that collabs could be made more easily, i think it would technically be nigh-on impossible to implement (site resources, think about the loading times if 15 lots of even just 6 individual instrument settings had to be rendered and loaded)
additionally, i do think that the ability to co-author sequences would be achievable with the resources available, and nice to see;
e.g. created 03-26-2023 by Bewilderator and Benvisions
a dropdown menu could provide the number of authors intended for creation and then adding them would be a case of searching/pasting the member number to which they can accept or deny
some form of easier private exchange-and-viewing of updates on a sequence (such as making it "unlisted" like in YT, requiring the link or authorship to view)
this would allow for collaboration (it wouldn't update real time, but would allow for private changes, and maybe also the ability to list the changes made since the last edit?)
i also voted no. altho it's a nice idea that collabs could be made more easily, i think it would technically be nigh-on impossible to implement (site resources, think about the loading times if 15 lots of even just 6 individual instrument settings had to be rendered and loaded)
additionally, i do think that the ability to co-author sequences would be achievable with the resources available, and nice to see;
e.g. created 03-26-2023 by Bewilderator and Benvisions
a dropdown menu could provide the number of authors intended for creation and then adding them would be a case of searching/pasting the member number to which they can accept or deny
some form of easier private exchange-and-viewing of updates on a sequence (such as making it "unlisted" like in YT, requiring the link or authorship to view)
this would allow for collaboration (it wouldn't update real time, but would allow for private changes, and maybe also the ability to list the changes made since the last edit?)