The last OSCRM post ever!

[VIP Master]

My two :

Thirdly,
In addition to what was said about number one, we should take further measures on security.

What's already good:
The website rules: https://onlinesequencer.net/forum/showth...p?tid=1538

What we should improve:
Chat restriction: We should do five sequences in addition to the 24-hour rule because some users still spam even after the 24-hour rule.

Bad idea. It's useless against bots, ineffective against paid spammers and very annoying to everyone else.

Introduce Yourself: Make it enforceable when they first join that the only forum to use is this. This will help soothe the bots from coming.

I agree although I would also add posting a song and a message in the chat before being able to participate in the forum.
It wouldn't hurt to change the "captcha" question from time to time too.

Fifthly,
Song permission depends on the user. While the rules say you can remix but not repost, people have different opinions on reposting and remixing. A list of users who do have a permission list would be here. https://onlinesequencer.net/forum/showth...p?tid=1763

Keep in mind, according to Lucent:

Reposting Permissions
Reposting is completely acceptable.
Reposting is acceptable, but please notify me when you do.
Reposting can be acceptable, but please notify me first before saving a copy.
Reposting is NOT acceptable.

Remixing Permissions
Remixing is completely acceptable. (✓)
Remixing is acceptable, but please notify me when you do. (OK)
Remixing can be acceptable, but please ask me permission first. (ASK)
Remixing is NOT acceptable. (✗)

As Lucent said, "If sequence infringement is deliberate by a certain member, we will hand out warnings accordingly."

Isn't there a way to simplify it? Like an additional Custom User Title or something? To simplify things and leave that thread for special cases.
Just an idea.

Sixthly,

I was also hoping for a new vote system. It's like going to court or being in a legal television show. It will help people argue about who should be banned or not without having immediate mutes or bans due to argumentative decisions made by the user. We should though, have some rules about it (live civilly, spam, etc.) and make a final decision.

Sounds quite complicated and unnecessary to me. I have faith that moderators will not abuse their powers, and if they do we will let them know.

Eightly and lastly,
As told in the thirteenth rule on the OS rules, https://onlinesequencer.net/forum/showth...p?tid=1538, for we mean you must be 13 to use chat, there is a reason why.

Why is there an age restriction on this?

Because: The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) has to do with the cost and work to comply with the law. And as told by some users, children under the age of 13 are annoying/immature at handling mature material.

I'm going to get a lot of *****it for this but make chat +15 (15 or more) only. You can use the site normally but not use or view the chat with 13 or 14, maybe send or receive PMs even but that may be an overkill.

Conclusion

By doing the rules and adding security, OS would be safer.

Any questions, confusion, or anything related, contact me on Microsoft ([email protected]), or you can PM me here or DM me on Discord.

I hope not to annoy if I do it here.