07-29-2017, 10:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-29-2017, 10:59 PM by guest.
Edit Reason: This one is great though: https://onlinesequencer.net/550548
)
(07-29-2017, 05:17 PM)JHXC Wrote:I didn't mean ear rape as in it being bad, I just meant ear rape as in my computer couldn't handle it, so it played over itself until it sounded like ear rape. This one is better though:(07-29-2017, 03:13 PM)Frank Wrote:(07-29-2017, 10:04 AM)JHXC Wrote:Longer lasting I think, but to be specific the speaker just gives up and doesn't play anything. Either that or it's OnSeq's fault so I was purposely ambiguous.(07-29-2017, 09:07 AM)Guest Wrote:[url=(07-28-2017, 05:46 PM)Frank Wrote: A. Wow, this got popular for something I made in 30 minutes late at night.
B. Here are my personal rankings:
1. \ Personally I find Crimson's and Frank's to have different strengths.
2. / Crimson's is more regular while Frank's is more groovy.
3. Guest [Overloaded something, couldn't hear it fully.]
4. asdf :/ [Didn't follow the rules.]
C. To see who truly wins, vote in the comments your personal rankings.
Did my sequence play over itself until it sounded like ear rape? If so, then it may be your computer because the same thing happens to me when I listen to JHXC's entry. :D]
[/url] better?
ok...
fine...
i guess i have to put down the michael bay tactics then.
[url=]
[/url]