Online Sequencer Make music online
  • Sequences
  • Members
  • Chat
  • Forum
  • Wiki

Existing user? Sign In Create account
Login at Online Sequencer Forums

Online Sequencer Forums › Online Sequencer › Online Sequencer Discussion
« Previous 1 … 67 68 69 70 71 … 79 Next »

Want some Ideas?

Thread tools
Want some Ideas?
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#1
06-09-2016, 10:56 PM (This post was last modified: 02-13-2017, 11:51 AM by SebastianQ. Edit Reason: Didn't mean to sound like a snob )
Don't want to read?: 


Having trouble with ideas? or maybe you don't have a firm grasp on how to use scales over chords, this weird piece I made should be able to help you out. Everything on here is based off my understanding of music theory, In other words, this is more akin to a classical style of music, so if you're looking for some good EDM, it ain't here, but if you just want some some ideas of a more classical nature, I might have some of those. If you like this sample, feel free to scroll down and check the others out: .
(p.s. I'm not trying to say that my genre or anything is better, I respect all tastes in music and anybody who takes the time to come up with it, except for pop)


Reply
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#2
06-13-2016, 09:55 AM
You know what I'm posting everything here. Fur Elise original. Fur Elise 2.0 with some little bells and whistles. a song I transcribed that one of my guitar teachers wrote. song made with Skyrim and Pirates of the Caribbean in mind. Some weird thing I made to test arpeggios I wrote long before finding this site, First thing I made here.


Reply
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#3
06-18-2016, 02:51 PM
The counting on this one sounds off, but has some interesting rhythms.


Reply
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#4
06-20-2016, 08:42 AM
Here's a really short loop that kind of reminds me of an intro to a cheesy family show


Reply
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#5
01-19-2017, 09:35 PM

New song, got some cool arpeggio chord stuff going on


Reply
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#6
01-19-2017, 11:26 PM

Short loop that gets really irritating after about 20 min


Reply
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#7
01-23-2017, 06:29 PM

Intrepid Depths- no clue on the name, it just sounded cool


  • x1
    • x1
    • Jonah
Reply
Jonah Offline
https://soundcloud.com/stuffedphiot
189 Posts:
   
#8
01-24-2017, 07:44 AM
One thing that bothered me was the OP. You said you are an "actual musician". I have no problem with this alone; by definition, you are an actual musician... but so is everyone else on this entire website. My problem is the way you worded it as if you believed only people who play or create classical music are musicians, and that people who make EDM are especially unmusical. I'm not personally offended by that, because I know you didn't mean it that way, but I'm guessing that some people are going to, or have, taken it the wrong way. It's a pretty small mistake, but I'd suggest rewording the OP so the message isn't misconstrued.
Now, back to the music. It's really good, and it gets better the more recent it is, but it still feels like it's missing something. I think the problem is that you mainly focus on chords, but then you don't make any parts where there aren't chords. ... I feel like there was a better way of describing that, but I failed entirely. Take Eric's song, [url=]Path of the Warrior[/url]. This song is very powerful. The difference between his songs and yours are that his have parts where only one note is playing, parts where two notes are playing, three, four, so on. Anyway, Your main problem is that you skip the build up and go straight into full chords. This causes a few problems for the audience. One, it takes away the depth of power for the song. The one/two note parts of Path of the Warrior are light, whereas the parts with full chords are heavy. He uses this to change the dynamics of the song at certain times, which you can see inside the song if you look. (Not going to try and describe a certain part of the song with words. I can't even describe words with words lol) Anyway, it doesn't take you long to notice how the beginning builds up from small 1-2 noters (Not the official term, IK) to full blown chords. You are missing the 1-2 noters. You got the big 3-5 noters down, but you still need the 1-2 noters. After all, an elephant doesn't look big next to a ton of other big elephants. You need to see something smaller as a ... reference point, I guess..

Hopefully this isn't going to be "Tl;dr"


Soundklowd
  • x2
    • x2
    • Crimson
    • Jacob_
Reply
Momocody Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#9
01-28-2017, 01:00 PM
I completely agree with Jonah. His points are not only valid, but hit pretty close to home. I, for one, am only a sophomore in high school with very limited classical training, yet I have managed to teach myself a considerable amount about music theory from experimenting and practice on this website and other resources. Although, I will point out that EDM is not music (I enjoy classically composed numbers), but my the points made are still true nevertheless.


Reply
SebastianQ Offline
Member
13 Posts:
 
#10
02-13-2017, 11:44 AM
(01-24-2017, 07:44 AM)Jonah Wrote: One thing that bothered me was the OP. You said you are an "actual musician". I have no problem with this alone; by definition, you are an actual musician... but so is everyone else on this entire website. My problem is the way you worded it as if you believed only people who play or create classical music are musicians, and that people who make EDM are especially unmusical. I'm not personally offended by that, because I know you didn't mean it that way, but I'm guessing that some people are going to, or have, taken it the wrong way. It's a pretty small mistake, but I'd suggest rewording the OP so the message isn't misconstrued.
Now, back to the music. It's really good, and it gets better the more recent it is, but it still feels like it's missing something. I think the problem is that you mainly focus on chords, but then you don't make any parts where there aren't chords. ... I feel like there was a better way of describing that, but I failed entirely. Take Eric's song, [url=]Path of the Warrior[/url]. This song is very powerful. The difference between his songs and yours are that his have parts where only one note is playing, parts where two notes are playing, three, four, so on. Anyway, Your main problem is that you skip the build up and go straight into full chords. This causes a few problems for the audience. One, it takes away the depth of power for the song. The one/two note parts of Path of the Warrior are light, whereas the parts with full chords are heavy. He uses this to change the dynamics of the song at certain times, which you can see inside the song if you look. (Not going to try and describe a certain part of the song with words. I can't even describe words with words lol) Anyway, it doesn't take you long to notice how the beginning builds up from small 1-2 noters (Not the official term, IK) to full blown chords. You are missing the 1-2 noters. You got the big 3-5 noters down, but you still need the 1-2 noters. After all, an elephant doesn't look big next to a ton of other big elephants. You need to see something smaller as a ... reference point, I guess..

Hopefully this isn't going to be "Tl;dr"
Oh, I didn't mean that, i meant I avidly studied music theory and play several instruments, I didn't mean to come off like an elitist. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. Also, to be honest I didn't think people actually read that stuff, just clicked on links.


  • x2
    • x2
    • Crimson
    • Jonah
Reply



Users browsing this thread:   1 Guest(s)


  •  Return to Top
  •  Contact Us
  •   Home
  •  Lite mode
© Rush Crafted with ❤ by iAndrew
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode
View a Printable Version
Subscribe to this thread
Add Poll to this thread
Send thread to a friend